“A New Eruption in Culture of Corruption”
Megyn Kelly and Michelle Malkin highlighted the problems farmers, feeders and ranchers have been having with the EPA on Fox News’ “America Live” on Monday, June 10, 2013.
We first alerted our readers to EPA’s misconduct in April in the AFF Sentinel newsletter, (“EPA Nominee No Stranger to Bad News for Agriculture-Part II,” 3/13/13, V10#09) detailing the agency’s supposedly mistaken release of detailed business and personal information on livestock feeding operations nationwide.
Later, more trickled out about EPA’s behavior — which screams ideology-driven intent — that not only did the agency release the info but continued to repeat some of the information a second time when it apologized for the first breach. Then it developed EPA had been granting fee waivers to 92 percent of favored enviro-zealot groups and denying fee waivers to conservative or free market groups anywhere from 50 percent to 92 percent to 100 percent of the time. These fees were charged for Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests (“Arrogance,” AFF Sentinel, 05/19/13, Vol. 10#26).
We’ve since learned these fees can run as much as a million dollars, so the fee waiver is no small consideration.
But it was terrific to see Kelly and Malkin rake EPA over the coals, especially in light of the changed attitude in America, given the scandals erupting since EPA’s breaches over the IRS targeting, NSA information gathering on citizens and DOJ surveilling reporters without the knowledge of the news organization involved.
The news peg that prompted this discussion on Fox News was a letter from 24 senators to EPA, demanding an explanation. Rightly so, Kelly and Malkin not only focused on the unauthorized release of information but on the biosecurity hazards posed by releasing this information to these groups. Malkin noted it’s not just farmers and ranchers noting this risk, but the Department of Homeland Security.
We would add that not only do feeders bear a risk from the activities of some of these groups themselves — judging by their past actions — but having that information out in more hands just adds to the risk that out-and-out terrorists could get their hands on target information. Witness the fire bombing attack at Harris Ranch just last year, claimed by the Animal Liberation Front (ALF). Harris can’t hide because of its large profile but spreading information on every animal feeding operation around the country certainly exposes many more operations to risk from terrorists we know are among us.
“Every day a new eruption in the culture of corruption,” Malkin termed these revelations. Not coincidentally, Malkin penned a book named “Culture of Corruption,” in 2010. Since Malkin is a bold, outspoken commentator, her book title seemed cutting edge then. Now, it seems downright prescient, given the revelations since the beginning of the scandal eruptions beginning with Benghazi.
Like this:
Like Loading...
USDA to Revive GIPSA Rule
We haven’t had a chance to read it yet but USDA has sent out copies of the newest iteration of the “GIPSA Rule” as it will appear in the Federal Register tomorrow, beginning a 60-day comment period.
The Rule is split into three parts, with the first dealing with the poultry industry. Part II deals with the definitions in section 202 a & b and requires 85 pages to handle. This is an Interim Rule, and will go into effect 60 days after publication. USDA will still take comments on this Interim Rule. This section deals with the requirement to show harm to competition and looks even from the titles and descriptions to be a real problem. In addition, it refers to USDA’s “longstanding interpretation” regarding harm to competition, something most of us never heard of before the 2010 Rule. If USDA had an interpretation counter to nearly all federal court decisions, it was news to most livestock folks.
The third section of the Rule is to define “Unfair Practices” and “Undue Preferences” and requires 69 pages to address. This section is a Proposed Rule, with comments being taken from 60 days after publication.
We will delve into the details very soon in our “AFF Sentinel” e-mail newsletter. If you do not receive the Sentinel and would like to do, send us an e-mail at steve@agfreedom.org.
Share this:
Like this: